10 May 2006

Gomez to be questioned today for 3rd time

From the James Gomez Blog.
(Click the photo to go to the Online Petition)
James Gomez is currently at the Police Cantonment Complex waiting to be questioned again by the police today, May 10.

This will be the third time. On May 7, he was detained at the airport, brought to the Police Cantonment Complex and questioned for 8 hours. On May 9, he was again questioned at the same location for another 5 hours. On both these occassions he was questioned by ASP Christopher Jacob of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).


Anonymous said...

still trying to make a case? putting on pressure till someone says/does something foolish?

clyde said...

When does prosecution turn into persecution? Is he formally under arrest everytime he is brought in for questioning? If they have nothing to charge him with, I believe he's not obliged to answer their questions nor should the police have the right to decline permission to leave Singapore. Either they have something to charge him with or they don't.

Anonymous said...

we read what is published on the papers. saying that Gomez informed the journalists that the police need him for investigations and he will cooperate to the fullest and he would not further give much details. Personally, I do not think I can trust the police so muc, since this institution does not seem to be neutral. Whatever the police had placed Gomez through during the questioning, we will not know, cos, would not the police have possibly warned him not to say anything and better watch what he says? From the looks of it, LKY for his prideful nature will want to make his words come to pass, making Gomez out of politics. I would not be shock if one day i hear the news reporting that the police after questioning Gomez and Gomez had admitted guilt. Could be on the criminal intimidation issue or any other u and coming "crime" that could be charged upon him. We are not the ones who are being questioned, a lot of things can happen one. things are not as simple as some may think. for those still hoping that nothing will happen to james gomez, you will be disappointed i guess. based on past history, we see LKY style, he will trample on any elite opposition figure and make sure they have no recourse. i heard from someone saying that he was driving towards the changi airport on monday evening and saw police road blocks. haha, u may wanna guess what is the road block for? we have elected such kind of a party to be the government to waste our taxes and reduce the productivity of the civil servants? the blood of these persecuted ones are in the hands of those who persecute them (you know who lah).

Anonymous said...

why nobody pt it to WKS - wrote 11-page story?

Anonymous said...

"I would not be shock if one day i hear the news reporting that the police after questioning Gomez and Gomez had admitted guilt."

Watching too much hollywood? Give our guys in blue a little more credit than that.

"Personally, I do not think I can trust the police so much, since this institution does not seem to be neutral."

You seem to be forgetting who's watching out for you when you sleep at night (or is that the Army)?

Some of your grievances may be against some of the leaders in PAP. That does not mean all members of PAP are bad. That does not mean the civil service arms are bad. That does not mean ANYONE working for the government is bad.

"haha, u may wanna guess what is the road block for?"

Why don't you enlighten us then?

I'm not trying to offend you or anoyone here, but look at some of the things you write again.

- Impassioned Singaporean

Anonymous said...

It's time to show your unhappiness. http://www.cafepress.com/freegomez
Wear it and show it, not silent and invisible petitions

Matilah_Singapura said...

>> Watching too much hollywood? Give our guys in blue a little more credit than that. <<

Sure, ordinarily S'pore cops do a good job.

BUT when they become political henchmen, they are no different from the thugs and criminals of the world...

... and therefore should be arrested for unlawfully depriving an individual of his liberty.

Anonymous said...

If gomez were to go to prison for this petty issue, PAP will loose about 20% - 25% vote, in the next GE. Lets hope that he is imprisoned for the freedom of Singapore in 2011. Than he will be the hero made by PAP, (otherwise he is just one of the nuts). Politicians, when they are prisoned, they will be happy. Because when released, their support will automatically rise, lot of sympathy votes will go to them. Going to prison for political and non-political reasons totally have different meanings. Look at Anwar Ibrahim and Ang San su Kii of Myanmar.

Anonymous said...

"Why don't you enlighten us then?" anonymous 5/11/2006 05:13:48 AM

It is better that we exercise our critical thinking ability and be convicted of the answers our own selves. No point other people telling you wat to beleive. What some of us can do is to continue to write and argue critically based on historical facts and current facts and discuss about the situation. Whether readers would agree or not, each has his right to have his own stand. So I would prefer for some areas, it is better not to spell out too clearly, it may stalk our ability to think. Just like when we do not know an answer in a classroom and ask the teacher and the teacher will plainly provide us with the answer. Sometimes this method may not be helpful. So I will refrain from "enlightening" here, if anyone of you would think I have the ability to. If an election department and the press which are supposed to be independent and neutral cant be so, what makes us think that other social istitutions under the monopolised power of the PxP will stand true to their very mission? Well... this is up to individual's own convictions and thought process.

Anonymous said...

perhaps some have not been interogated by the CID before, so you will never know how they grill people, haha, until one day you yourself gets drilled by them day in day out, 8 hours, 10 hours, etc, until you go bongus, and with dizzy head and scare. dun be naive.

Anonymous said...

Despicable! they'll not get my vote.

lct said...

my prediction - he will not be formally charged. He will be barred from entering the country. No explanation will be given except that based on investigation he is found to be a danger to society - he will be stripped of citizenship (thereby not be able to participate in politics here forever). He will then be given a ticket to Sweden -one way.

Anonymous said...

what is more dangerous than the danger of our own BIG EGO? Our ego is our biggest enemy in life!!

lee hsien tau said...

Ever since I heard James Gomez had his passport and boarding pass impounded, and his sorry ass prevented from leaving for Sweden, I have been staring at the ceiling, the words 'what the fuck' pounding through my brain. And it is Section 506 & 507 of the penal code that had got me near berserk. I had to write this.

I was slapped with 8 email harassment charges back in 2000. Because 8 email harassment charges couldn't have kept me locked up, Investigating Officer Oem Prakash Singh of Clementi Police Division (hereafter referred to as 'the modern singh') slapped an additional charge of criminal intimidation on me so as to raise the bail amount the judge then pegged at $50K (the same amount which, may I remind you, TT Durai is presently running around loose on). Of course the modern singh counted on me not having a bailer with $50K, so I spent 5 months inside awaiting trial.

The excuse for the criminal intimidation charge was a phone call I made to Koh Chong Huat (a cousin of mine) telling him in exact words 'You are 50+, sooner or later, you have to die'. I thought it was a given, nothing being more certain than death and taxes, that reminding somebody, anybody, of his age couldn't possibly constitute a criminal offense, especially since the guy was actually 50+ (I'd admit Lee Kuan Yew may be offended to be reminded of his age, and that death was likely to be knocking on his door anytime, but not enough to constitute a criminal offense, especially when he's going to be continuing to be having birthday parties, and his cronies are going to be showing up not trying to pretend, I hope, that it is something other than birthdays that they are going to be celebrating.)

But not to digress. The reason why I was locked up was because I had finally found something I was looking for on and off since 1995. And I was showing up at all the awkward places, the CPIB, the Law Society of Singapore, and the Legal Aid. They all found excuses of one sort or another. Sooner or later I was going to latch on to a lawyer, yes?

I latched onto the wrong lawyer, however. Someone by the name of Chiam See Tong. He suggested leaving Hoo Sheau Farn out of the lawsuit, and sue principally Koh Thong (Koh Chong Huat's old man), and Lim Swee Ying (my late father's old hag), and he also told me that he didn't want to figure in the case, and therefore would be helping me sue my relatives in my own name. Who's to know Chiam See Tong would be colluding with Yik Tze Kong, the lawyer representing the respondents to the suit.

Time was of essence. If I wasn't latching onto Chaim See Tong, I would've to latch onto some other lawyer pretty quick. The plan was to have this Chiam See Tong set up a case for me, I land in jail, and the case applied to be struck out by the respondents, the lawyers acting for the parties being in collusion.

So Koh Chong Huat made a complaint against me. That made me a 'wanted' person. And I was supposed to know that (not that I did). Then Yik Tze Kong applied to have the case that Chiam See Tong set up for me struck off by the civil court expecting me not to show up to defend.

But I got arrested at Changi cargo complex going through the check-point reporting to my first day of temporary work. And I was held for 5 months awaiting trial. I made calls to Chiam See Tong then at the police lockup, wrote to Chiam See Tong whilst I was remanded, met Chiam See Tong whilst I was at the Subordinate Court, and Chiam See Tong visited me whilst I was held at Buangkok Chalet, but he wouldn't help me with these fresh charges I was up against, and resisted suggestions that the civil case he was helping me with and the criminal case I was facing were connected.

Topmost in the mind of the modern singh must've been whether I had knowledge of the application by Yik Tze Kong to have the case set up for me by Chiam See Tong struck off. If so, and I apprised the court of the fact, the judge would likely find that I have no case to answer. So was it a coincidence then, that when I was finally released, my laptop and papers pertaining to my civil suit were missing from my rented room, and I had to cough up $50 to get them back, and later, when I thought it wise to ask for a receipt for the $50, was refused, and the $50 returned instead?

Because I was arrested in the wrong sequence, and the all important letter was left undiscovered in my post office mailbox, Yik Tze Kong didn't show up at the civil court to have the civil case set up for me by Chiam See Tong struck out (references to it at my blog).

You may be asking me why the modern singh would have me arrested in the wrong sequence. The modern singh didn't have me arrested. I was arrested by the police division (Bedok) in charge of the Changi cargo complex. I cannot be 'wanted' unless there was an APB out for me. With an APB out on me, it was always possible for me to be arrested in the wrong sequence.

There is a lesson in all this for James Gomez.

Even though I was remanded without having visitors (except for the one-time visit by Chiam See Tong at Buangkok Chalet - now upgraded to Buangkok Recreational Club - where I was also warned by Dr George Fernandez to be careful of what I say in Court or face institutionalization on Christmas Day, 2000 - bloody arse hole showed up just to warn me), and therefore could not otherwise seek representation, had the criminal intimidation charge struck off by the kangaroo of a judge in half a day of deliberation.

The trial was scheduled for a 2 day hearing. There was a lot of shenanigan going on in Remand. I was being threatened (and the irony was that I was in there for Section 506 & 507) such that I was disinclined to drag proceedings beyond the day. All that seemed to be coming out of the mouth of Koh Chong Huat was that he was felt 'very harassed'. For nearly half the morning I was standing in the dock with my hands cuffed behind my back (and who said our legal system was just? and there is no kangaroo jumping around in Court?) until the judge noticed.

The judge was screwing me left and right for everything that was coming out of my mouth until Koh Chong Huat said that he had a pretty good idea who was at the other end of the phone (that being me). The judge made certain he heard right what Koh Chong Huat said, then struck out the criminal intimidation charge. As I'm no lawyer, I don't actually know what the fuck happened. But I will try to figure it out here. Section 506 & 507 cannot be liberally applied or else a Pandora’s Box would be opened, and total anarchy will ensue. There must be a threshold above which genuine fear can reasonably be deemed to be inculcated in the criminally intimidated, such as where the victim doesn't know who is victimizing him. A fear transformed into terror by some unknown quantity.

After that the DPP started to sweat like a pig, and Koh Chong Huat started to need a microphone to be heard, and the judge started turning on me. It was as if a big concession had been made to me, and the kangaroo had begun jumping all over the Court again. The biggest problem going for the trial was Koh Chong Huat needed a microphone, I complained to the judge I couldn't hear him without a microphone, and the judge sitting practically next to Koh Chong Huat couldn't understand what the fuck I was unhappy about (and who said our legal system was just? and there is no kangaroo jumping around in Court?). I was practically forced to abdicate my defense.

The judge offered, before his lunch break, to lynch me on 4 charges of email harassment, if I capitulated, or on all 8, if I continued with my defense. What troubled me was my cousin needing a microphone, the DPP needing a towel, and the kangaroo jumping all over the court room. Something just wasn't right. I wondered what was in my post office box (which had rental renewal coming up), and I didn't want to go back to Remand where I was being threatened. So I capitulated, and the judge fined me $6000, and stretched me for more than 30+ days in lieu (which Dr Chee Soon Juan, may I remind you, got off for just a week).

Out of jail, Chiam See Tong was a little scared to meet me along North Bridge Road outside his law office. Until I had a talk with Chan Fook Meng, I wasn't too clear why. Then there was the 2001 general election. But Chiam See Tong was dragging his feet with the case he was 'helping' me with even after that. So I had to start writing my own letters.

A letter I wrote to Standard Chartered Bank caused Ow Koon Thiam to threaten to sue me for defamation through his lawyer Hoh & Partners (now Hoh Law Corp). So I went along to Chiam See Tong to consult (until I had a talk with Chan Fook Meng, I didn't see why not), and he offered to help me with the defamation suit. Even though I hadn't had my talk with Chan Fook Meng yet, I saw a problem. Chiam See Tong was dragging his feet with my civil suit, did not defend me in my criminal case, and now was offering to represent me in this defamation suit.

I told Chiam See Tong I was getting the hang of it with this Court thing, fresh from my victory against the modern singh and his Section 506 & 507 and all that, and since a defamation suit is something somebody else set up for me, and all I have to do is show up and get fucked by the judge, I'd handle it myself, thank you very much. And I was pressing him to carry on with the original civil suit. I wrote to Ow Koon Thiam's lawyer, a Ms Petula Wong, that I would've been most pleased to see them in Court (and you should read the reply I got at my blog). And you can understand why Chiam See Tong decided to be a full time member of parliament after that. And you can understand why I have a price on my head.

Can you understand why Lee Kuan Yew and Wong Kan Seng are such mother fucking idiots? (and those people who voted for them as well?) If you can gerrymander the laws just to keep yourself in power (for whatever honorable or dishonorable intentions), you cannot then call to account those certainly more dishonorable persons from using the same laws to their own personal advantage.

If Lee Kuan Yew is going to be troubled by James Gomez not suing for being called a liar, the mother fucker is going to have a hard time going to sleep every night. The Cantonment Complex, even if it is re-built into the Cantonment Catacomb, is not going to be able to handle half the lying population asked to show up every day justifying themselves. And would he then be going to be going after Ow Koon Thiam because he didn't after all sue me and SOMETHING HERE IS GENUINELY NOT RIGHT.

And worse still, which fucking moron came up with the idea that Section 506 & 507 would stick on James Gomez when it didn't even glue on me for half a day in Court? And me not even being represented? And should Section 506 & 507 be bounced around all over the place from now on when somebody tells a lie such as when a student is late for school and fib to his principal?

Is James Gomez and his 'lie' such a big issue to the MIW that they have to scrape barrel bottom for something as inappropriate as Section 506 & 507. Or is Lee Kuan Yew trying to cover up for his one, ever, and only election strategy gone berserk (which even the UMNO deceased would be sick of by now). From my own personal affront at the wrong end of Section 506 & 507, I can assure you that everybody in the know, including Dr Chee Soon Juan, just have to be uncontrollably laughing their socks off. And the courtroom is caught between a pit bull and a lapping dog. How is the court ever going to placate Lee Kuan Yew and Wong Kan Seng over the James Gomez non-event without losing its dignity?

I do not pretend to not to know that should Lee Kuan Yew, if he were to read all this, whether he'd pin me up together with Dr Chee and his sister. It would've been my privilege, my honor. Go tell him. I need political asylum to live beyond of next month. There is after all a price on my head, whether I keep my trap shut or not. So I'm not worse off by it.

Anonymous said...

Hi Mr. Lee H.T.

I empathise with you situation as I read your story. The law and the judge can never be fair in my personal opinion... I guess you have gone thru injustice. Same case for james gomez, i think more actions will be taken upon him, like as in what you have experienced before, being locked up, on trial, etc. The system is corrupt from top down lah.

Anonymous said...

Yet, they still can sue others and want others to apologise for saying that they are corrupt. Out of suppression, others have to apologise and pay damages. Isn't this action itself is a corruption??? Indeed, confused people, aren't? chen mao tuen