Suddenly the requests for transparency and accountability are ignored. As if by magic the problem has dissappeared and no one will ever again refer to the two nouns for fear having their own organisation become the unmentionables. And "the public", all of them, are happy again in lala-land according to Channel News Asia after having done a highly rigourous, indepth, and representative survey with a sample of 2 respondents.
Charity groups and public welcome Gerard Ee as NKF's interim chairman
The public also expressed support for NKF with Mr Ee at the helm.
"He will bring more confidence," said one member of the public.
"I hope the new chairman will restore their confidence, the people's confidence and continue to raise funds," said another.
"The general consensus among members of the public and the various charity organisations is that with a new leadership in place at the NKF, it is time to move on and concentrate on the future to rebuild public confidence and continue to lend a helping hand to kidney patients."
To read the article click here.
Surely claiming 'General consensus' after interviewing an anonymous 2 people in a population of approximately 4 million is a joke. I wonder if the 'journalist', and I use that term loosely, actually interviewed 2 people, or simply copied what they were told to write contained in the memo from upon high.
NKF
3 comments:
too bad i wasn't the one interviewed, or i would have given a negative answer to that question, the same seems to go for every other person i've been talking to about this
why is it so??
anonymous, why is 'what' so? what does your 'it' refer to?
Post a Comment