15 Jun 2006

Lees thinking of avoiding open trial

From the Singapore Democrat:

Last month, Dr Chee Soon Juan had written that Mr Lee Kuan Yew and Mr Lee Hsien Loong would try to avoid going to open court over the NKF lawsuit:

The only worry is that the plaintiffs will try to prevent the matter from going to trial and avoid being cross-examined. This can be done through frivolous court applications to try to bog the process down and drain the defendants financially. Another possibility is that the Lees may use legal technicalities to overcome the defendants’ actions thereby preventing the matter from going to open trial.” (Click here to read full statement.)

It seems that the Lees are living up to their reputation. During the pre-trial conference held today their lawyer, Mr Adrian Tan of Drew & Napier, dropped the bombshell that his clients are likely to apply for summary judgment.

Summary judgment means that the matter will be heard behind closed-doors (instead of open court), no witnesses will be allowed to be called, and the defendants will not be allowed to present their case.

The assistant registrar will then make the decision as to whether the Dr Chee and Ms Chee are guilty of defaming the Lees – without having heard evidence from anyone.

In 2001, Mr Lee Kuan Yew and Mr Goh Chok Tong also applied for summary judgment against Dr Chee Soon Juan over the Indonesian-loan lawsuit. Dr Chee was found guilty of defaming Messrs Lee and Goh and ordered to pay the two $500,000 in damages – all without a trial.

In the present case, Dr Chee and Ms Chee have indicated repeatedly that they will not apologise to the Lees and look forward to facing both father and son in court when both sides will present witnesses and subject themselves to cross-examination. Lawyer M Ravi have also indicated repeatedly that he looked forward to cross-examining the Lees.

Apparently getting a bout of cold-feet, the Lees are now thinking twice about proceeding with the matter and want to have it heard behind closed-doors. If the Lees go ahead with decision to apply for summary judgment, it will signal the biggest cowardly act ever to be taken by PAP’s leaders.

The Lees ought not resort to such unseemly action. They should face the Chees in open court so that all parties can get to the bottom of the matter and have the public see and hear all the evidence presented.

Dr Chee and Ms Chee, having discussed the matter with lawyer Mr M Ravi, have decided that they would like to call the following as witnesses and apply to subpoena them if necessary:

1. Mr Goh Chok Tong (Senior Minister)
2. Mr Khaw Boon Wan (Minister for Health)
3. Mr Lim Hng Kiang (2nd Minister for Finance)
4. Mdm Ho Ching (Managing Director of Temasek Holdings and wife of PM Lee)
5. Mr Lee Suan Yew (brother of MM Lee)
6. Former NKF Board members
7. Head of the National Council of Social Services
8. Head of the Housing and Development Board
9. Head of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation

10. Mr Tang Liang Hong (sued by PAP leaders)
11. Mr Francis Seow (former solicitor-general and detained under the ISA)
12. Mr Tan Wah Piow (former University of Singapore student leader and jailed)
13. Ms Tang Fong Har (detained under ISA in the so-called Marxist conspiracy)
14. Mr Said Zahari (detained under the ISA for 17 years)
15. International experts/academics



Letter to the Lees

14 Jun 2006

Mr Lee Kuan Yew
Mr Lee Hsien Loong
Istana, Singapore

Dear Sirs,

It is with much regret, though not with the slightest surprise, that we learn from your lawyer this morning that you are considering applying for summary judgment in the lawsuit that you have taken against us. We had suspected all along that you would try to avoid going to open trial. Our suspicion seems to have basis.

We have repeatedly told you since the day you sent us your letter of demand that we will not apologise and that we look forward to seeing the both of you in court. There is, therefore, absolutely no case for a summary judgment. Such an application would become a laughing stock of the world.

Mr Lee Kuan Yew said on 9 May 2006: "If anybody calls me a liar and dishonest, I'll take him straightaway to court. I'll be in the witness box..." By going for summary judgment, how are you going to be in the witness box? And if you don’t get into the witness box, what conclusions do you expect us to draw from this?

We have lined up a list of witnesses that will support our defence and tear up your case. We have a lawyer, Mr M Ravi, who looks forward to cross-examining you. If you believe that you have just as strong a case, let us go to trial so that we can get to the bottom of everything.

We have said it before and we will say it again: We are prepared to face you in court Please don’t try to avoid this by applying for summary judgment. It is most unbecoming of a Minister Mentor and Prime Minister. If you have the temerity to sue us over the article, at least have the courage to face us in court.

Sincerely,

Chee Soon Juan
Chee Siok Chin

Related: Today says CSJ trying to avoid Lee

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

In the west Chinese have for years been renouned for a yellow streak down their backs.

The present Lee case against the Chees perpetuates the tag, plus the fact cowardly Singapore has never ever offerd it's soldier to any theatre of war.

"We may consider sending our soldiers to East Timor, if UN asks us," said mini Lee in Australian yesterday, more interested in forcing the Aussies to open the airways to the dreaded SIA.

What an absolute cowards.
The world must be urinating in their trousers with laughter when they read about this country.

I do not comprehend how this man Lee can hold his head up in any civilised society.

Let the Chees have their say in open court, bring the Lees into the witness box, send two thousand troups to East Timior, and accept the Aussie descision not to open the airways, then the world will once again look at Singapore and say, god that country possesses balls after all. it'certainly the place to trade in.

Anonymous said...

Singapore requires some strict colonial rule. Bring back the good old British army.

I remember during the days of the 1950's how the sargeant majors dealt with any local cowardice; a quick insertion of their swagger sticks up the anuses of the none believers and bad peformers.
It worked wanders. As an old solder viewing the Island's population today, those old sgts would have a field day.

Anonymous said...

ranting fellow

Anonymous said...

i cannot believe that men like these governed the land. no wonder the 'managers' of national entities (NKF, GIC, Temasek etc) manages the nation's assets knowing that they do not have to be accountable to the public. they seemed to have the arrogance of membership of an elite club and deemed themselves untouchables. but if history is any indication of things to come, ..............

Anonymous said...

They have always been bullies and now having to face a dose of justice, they are really unbecoming.

The Chees are of course more upright than the Lees.

Search Engine Optimization - SEO Services said...

Here you find
seo services - search engine optimisation for your site or company we are top in these field.

Diet pills - Phentermine online said...

Here you find information on diet pills,
phentermine online diet pills , Adipex, weightlosstips and Bremolanotide For more visit http://weightlosstips.tblog.com/

dinesh said...

ive been looking at this sight for awhile now. i must say, i have been impressed at the angles covered and the issues at hand.

but i guess the study of 'freedom' is not something that the writers of these blogs are fully equipped with.

let me shed some light

was nelson mandela hiding behind a mask?

was john lennon secretly sending tapes of his visions?

was steve biko trying to get rid of the apartheid while in another country?

was martin luther's famous speech done via satelite?

so in order for this blog's authors who somehow seem to think they're revolutionists, come out and challenge the status-quo and stop hiding...

perhaps then, people will take you seriously...but of course, if u do indeed want to challenge the status quo, intelligence must be used. articles run by this website have been highly one-sided, which is biased to begin with.

like ive said above, i do indeed respect the focus the writes have given, but come out and show yourselves....

Anonymous said...

absolute fucking cowards and hypocrites.

they said they would go to the witness box so please do it.

Matilah_Singapura said...

On with the show! I want to see knuckledusters shatter jaw bones! I wanna hear anthems of Martyrdom composed by Dick Lee and sung by Jacinta!

Man, this is better than watching dem self-rightoeus Christians fed to the lions in the gloriously entertaining Roman times!

Anonymous said...

Of course they can never be a OPEN TRIAL or FREEDOM of EXPRESSION!!! OR else like the CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY, they are afraid to lose their ONE-PARTY POLITICAL POWER!!!!

ONE-PARTY STATE and PARTY SURVIVAL is the MOST IMPORTANT!



Evil deed of Chinese Communist Party to maintain its one party political power – including Organ Harvesting from LIVING Falun Gong practitioners in Labour Camp in China

http://chinacommunistparty.blogspot.com

http://chinesecommunistparty.blogspot.com

To download ‘9 ping’ 《九评共产党》- (writings of evil Chinese Communist party) http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/4/12/13/n746020.htm (Source: 9ping.com)


or tune in to 106.5 FM (radio) for the reading of 9ping everyday at 3pm and 10pm

lee hsien tau said...

LKY's a lawyer. What's there to fear about Dr Chee. Only thing is for GCT to gag his wife. Imagine Durai asking for summary judgement? The gold tap would think "Jesus, I thought I was worth 1K".