16 Feb 2006

Video: Tech giants' 'nauseating collaboration' in China

Congressman: Yahoo, Google, Cisco Systems, Microsoft are "agents of repression"
In a House subcommittee hearing for global human rights, Rep. Tom Lantos accuses four major U.S. technology companies of "complete compliance" with Chinese repression of civil rights and political dissent. Their actions are, he says, "a disgrace."

Watch the Video
8 minutes 8 seconds

Tech giants condemned by House subcommittee chair

Rep. Christopher Smith chairs the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights and International Operations. At a hearing in Washington, he reads a pointed indictment of Cisco Systems, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo. Smith says the tech companies aid repression by the Chinese government.

Watch the Video

12 minutes 12 seconds

Feb 15, 2006 9:44:00 AM

Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft under fire in Washington 10:40AM

America's technology giants have 'enthusiastically volunteered for China's censorship brigade'. The heated remarks came during a hearing of the US House of Representatives international relations sub-committee in which some of the US's biggest Internet companies came under fire over their dealings in China.
The major search engines Yahoo!, Google and MSN along with Internet hardware company Cisco have been asked by the Committee to explain their business practices in the People's Republic. The Committee fears that the companies have made the pursuit of profit and market share in the rapidly expanding Chinese market a priority over their commitment to human rights.

The most stinging remarks came from California congressman Tom Lantos who told the companies 'Your abhorrent activities in China are a disgrace. I simply do not understand how your corporate leadership sleeps at night'.

Campaigners have watched with dismay as companies have put aside their principles in order to do business with the Chinese authorities. Last month Google caused outrage when it emerged that the company would be censoring the results of its Google.cn subsidiary in order to operate within Chinese borders. Last year, the pressure group Reporters Without Borders revealed that Yahoo! had handed over the email records of a human rights campaigner to Chinese prosecutors. The man subsequently received a sentence of ten years in jail.

The companies say that if they operate in China, they have to comply with local law as they do anywhere else in the world. Michael Callahan, a Yahoo! senior vice president told the Committee, 'I don't think it would be appropriate for me to sit in my office in California and order a Chinese citizen in our Beijing operation not to follow a lawful command. We are very distressed about the consequences of complying with Chinese law'.

Under pressure Google said that it may consider pulling out of China if the country's human rights record did not improve.

Lantos, a Holocaust survivor, asked the companies whether they were 'ashamed' of their activities China and dismissed their pleas that they were following local law. 'IBM complied with legal orders when they cooperated with Nazi Germany,' he told the four. 'Those were legal orders under the Nazi German system. Do you think that IBM during that period had something to be ashamed of?'

Steve Malone

Related Content
Politicians lash out at tech firms over China
In rare briefing, China defends Internet content controls
Google fixes China search bugs
U.S. task force looks at Internet censorship in China
Yahoo grapples with online rights


Anonymous said...

they are stones in the river. The river always beats the stone.


Cory said...

Only in America would we presume to tell other countries how to run their businesses. Even though I'm against any and all censership the irony of listening to our administration berate the tech companies is laughable. We already have a state run media NOW, censership is now the "norm" and nobody is doing anything about it here in America. What about America's abuses of human rights?

rench00 said...

agree with cory's comment.

i wonder which is better, have a censored version of google in China, so that people at least have a search engine to go onto the internet, or tell google that they shouldn't capitulate to the dictators of China so that the people of China don't have anything at all?

my view is that the former is the best solution in an imperfect world. it's an intermediate step to be taken before we get to the final destination of a freer society.

ted said...

By all your accounts, the Senators and Congressmen of the United STates have better start looking for another job. Since whatever they do is only hypocritical.

Anonymous said...

hi can i ask where is the newspaper reprt by the aussie rapist cum drug dealer

Anonymous said...

hi i post 2 comment bout the australia being a land of criminals. can you tell where iit is now as i want to email it to the writer