John Burton
Financial Times
10 Nov 06
Singapore is proposing to tighten laws governing the internet and public gatherings as part of an overhaul of the city-state's penal code.
The changes would give the government broader statutory authority to prosecute offenders and to punish them with higher fines, in spite of promises by Lee Hsien Loong, the prime minister, to promote an "open society".
Singapore has some of the world's toughest restrictions on free speech and assembly. The issue received international attention during the recent International Monetary Fund/World Bank annual meeting. Singapore banned outdoor protests and some accredited representatives of non-governmental organisations were barred from entering.
Reporters Without Borders recently ranked Singapore 146th out of 167 countries surveyed for press freedom.
Outdoor gatherings of five or more persons and speaking in public without a police licence are already forbidden.
The proposed amendments, which will be submitted to parliament after a month-long period of public consultation, would give the government more power to act against public gatherings by no longer having to prove in court that they intended to cause a disturbance.
Singapore has laws that could be used against public protesters "but the definition of an offence will be wider now", said Amolat Singh, a Singapore lawyer.
"If five or more persons gather in preparation to commit a crime, such as a gang robbery, it will constitute an unlawful assembly. We need to be able to take action even before they commit robbery," the government said.
Internet users could face punishment for defamation and making "statements that cause public mischief" or for "the wounding of racial feelings". Documents, including film or sound recordings, sent over the internet could be subject to criminal prosecution.
The internet has rapidly become an alternative to Singapore's state-controlled media. A survey released on Thursday by the government's Media Development Authority said 65 per cent of Singaporeans between 15 and 49 were at least moderate internet users, and a third of people in the same age group produced internet content, such as blogs.
The government said the new laws would help to combat crime, such as credit card fraud, and punish those who disturb racial and religious harmony.
The government remained unapologetic about its tough controls over the traditional media and the internet.
Further interpretations from South East Asian Press Alliance...
[...]
In particular, there is the expansion of certain sections to cover offences committed via the Internet and other electronic media, namely: section 298, which makes it an offence to deliberately "wound the religious feelings" of anyone, through words or other acts; section 499, which touches on defamation, and section 505, which covers "statements conducing to public mischief".
In addition, section 298 may be expanded to include the "wounding of racial feelings". The ministry said this will "provide another option to the Sedition Act, to charge such offenders in future cases", referring to the September 2005 case of two men charged under the Sedition Act for posting racist comments on the Internet. One was eventually imprisoned for one month while the other was imprisoned for a day and fined a maximum S$5,000 (approx. US$). The maximum prison sentence is three years, but repeat offenders can be imprisoned up to five years.
[...]
Another amendment that may affect Internet users is a new provision to make it an offence for anyone who, while outside the country, abets an offence committed in the country.
And its as if Singapore has regressed back into the 1960's version of its self. That Judge really knows how to keep his or her eye on the ball.
What is this? Is this a communist country?
ReplyDeleteBetter leave this country asap before it becomes a true communist country.
Very sick of this place!!!
I think father and son got some inspiration from Minority report (uncensored ver) for this new legislation.....
ReplyDeletenew tricks hard to learn
ReplyDeletethe "climate of fear" is because u never know when u'll suddenly be prosecuted for actions dat r not even deemed as crimes elsewhere...this country has become so stifling i wonder whether the price of a so-called safe environment is worth it
ReplyDeleteWe live in a very Kafkaesque country. We're all potential Josef K.'s.
ReplyDeleteIf anyone has ever bothered to do any research on the history of the great father, from the time he was studying, you will realise that he is greater than any other ruler in the entire world. I believe we have the making of the greatest dynastry ever. His foresight and tactical moves are so great that he is simply the best. I have learned that the only way to remain unchallenged is not to by popular vote but by eliminating not only the identified enemy but even the smallest posibble treat. Be it 22 year old or your best friend who served you loyally for 20 odd years. Trust no one except family. That is the holy mantra that will ensure your fame for generation to come. I repeat the famous words."Generations to come will scarce belief that such a one as this walked upon this earth"..for the wrong reasons.
ReplyDeleteTo create an "open society"?!? It looks MIW are "opening" up the place for them to crush and destroy all dissenting views or voice with impunity.
ReplyDeleteEvery 4 years or so, we voted for them so they can screw even more than the previous 4.
ReplyDeleteNo wonder that Taiwanese guy said that we are stupid! We are the only species of this kind to inhibit this planet. Elsewhere the
MIW would have been kicked out long
ago!