tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5539995.post115092132035942807..comments2023-11-05T17:53:13.405+08:00Comments on Singabloodypore: Pensées: 10 short notes on seditionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5539995.post-1150928882816504332006-06-22T06:28:00.000+08:002006-06-22T06:28:00.000+08:00On those Danish cartoons Muslims deemed offensive,...On those Danish cartoons Muslims deemed offensive, it is understood that images of their prophet are forbidden and would be offensive to them, not to mention caricatures. So I accept the local ban on publishing them. But what about those of Jesus Christ and Christianity? Christians say they condemn idolatry and symbolic items. What bullshit. The most common 'idol' of Christianity is their famous Cross. Most famous symbol in the world, much more than the defiant and symbolic middle finger. Or go inside any church - Catholic or otherwise - and you'll see idols-like statues of Jesus hanging on a cross or the Virgin Mary carrying an infant Jesus in her arms. How is that not idolising? If images and depictions of Jesus Christ aren't forbidden, then caricatures of Him certainly wouldn't be seditious. And come on, if a cartoon depicting Jesus biting someone is remotely seditious, then what about films like <I>Passion of the Christ and the Da Vinci Code</I>? Jews find the former anti-semitic and Christians find the latter blasphemous. So why weren't they both banned?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5539995.post-1150924624349566302006-06-22T05:17:00.000+08:002006-06-22T05:17:00.000+08:00WTF would Jesus do?Jesus will dismiss it, that's w...WTF would Jesus do?<BR/><BR/>Jesus will dismiss it, that's what. Christians should know that He who was apparently crucified for the sins of Man would not hold any grudge over such a petty matter.. Satan's kids would, though.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com